the services
the Courses
the podcast
A certified sex therapist and existential psychotherapist committed to thoughtful conversations about love, desire, & embodiment
Meet Dr. Emma
Subscribe to the Intimate Philosopher on:
A conversation with Dr. Laura Anderson, religious trauma specialist and author of When Religion Hurts You, on purity culture and sexual trauma, the body as a place to start over, and what high-control religion does to desire in marriage.
Dr. Laura Anderson’s résumé reads like a sprawl: religious trauma, domestic violence, sexualized violence, nervous system function, women’s health. Then she explains the wiring, and it turns out to be one subject viewed from five doors. A high-control institution teaches a body what it is for, what it owes, and what it must never want. The nervous system keeps the curriculum long after the person has stopped believing in the school.
She is a therapist and the author of When Religion Hurts You, the founder of the Center for Trauma Resolution and Recovery, and the creator of the Certified Religious Trauma Practitioner program, which trains therapists, coaches, professors, and volunteers to work with people leaving high-control environments. Her clients live on nearly every continent, and her explanation for the training program is arithmetic: she is one person, and the need is not. She also describes a clinical advantage in shared vocabulary.
In this conversation with Dr. Emma, Laura says something most sex therapists will recognize and fewer will say aloud. She thinks purity culture is a form of sexual abuse. The pledge cards were the visible part. Behind them sat an apparatus of rules about clothing, gender roles, physical contact, and what a godly relationship should look like, plus a threat and a promise: break the rules and marriage will suffer, keep them and the sex will be out of this world the moment you say I do.
Laura’s image for what follows is a switch. Sexuality, she says, tends to develop like a dimmer, turned up gradually across a lifetime. In people who have experienced sexualized violence, it behaves like a light switch: off, then suddenly on. She sees the same pattern in people raised in purity culture, who were told for years to keep every desire off and then expected to flip the whole system on once the legal and holy paperwork was filed. Women raised female, she says, often came to believe they were asexual, because sex had never been described as theirs. Then the wedding night arrives, and a body trained for suppression does what it was trained to do.
That sets up the question the episode keeps returning to. If a body can learn to treat itself as dangerous without anyone laying a hand on it, what do we call the injury? Laura reports finding this pattern over and over in her clinical work, and says there is now research pointing in the same direction: the aftermath of purity culture can resemble the aftermath of sexualized violence, and it can appear in people exposed for a just a couple of months or for decades. Emma, who spent years working with trauma survivors, names the line she highlighted in Laura’s book, that this really is sexual trauma, and the standard that follows from it. Treat it with the seriousness you would give any injury a friend described to you.
The dimmer reappears at the kitchen table. Laura describes the first purity culture couple she ever treated, in tears in her office: they had done everything they were told, had not even kissed before the wedding day, and the sex was terrible and disconnected. Over years, she says, sex in these marriages tends to become a matter of obligation and expectation, with particular pressure on women to satisfy a partner so that he will not stray. Emma sees the other end of the arrangement in her own office, where desire discrepancy, already the most common problem she treats, seems to her turned up to fifteen among men who came out of high-control religion. Her instinctive question: is this the only part of the body that was ever permitted to receive anything good?
Laura’s answer concerns the whole body. In these systems bodies are distrusted, emotions are suspect, and women’s bodies are treated as hazards to the men around them, which turns women into their own surveillance. Men are taught that they are sexual animals who cannot control themselves, and then taught that wanting confirms the diagnosis. Her conclusion deserves an argument: nobody wins in a patriarchal system, men included. Emma brings the version she hears from younger husbands who have left the old arrangement and still say I want you to want it, and asks where in that sentence a wife is supposed to find room to actually want.
Where does anyone start with a body they have spent years treating as an adversary? Laura’s answer is modest enough to be slightly funny. Notice when you need to use the restroom. She chooses it because it is neutral, free of the freight that eating and sleeping can carry. What tells you? A fullness low in the stomach, a flush in the cheeks, a little restlessness. How do you feel afterward? From there she builds outward, on the logic that a person who has criticized someone for a lifetime cannot walk in one day and demand closeness. Trust arrives through consistency, curiosity, and patience, the way it does between people. She describes having been on the other side of this herself, hating her body and resisting the advice for roughly two years before her symptoms forced the experiment.
The phenomenologists would recognize the stakes. Merleau-Ponty argued that the body is how we have a world at all, the instrument of every perception we have. A body taught to be an enemy leaves its owner with a smaller world, and the restroom becomes the absurdity of everyday life doing its best work: the first square foot of reclaimed territory. It is also brain in a jar syndrome in miniature. Laura jokes that a fully developed prefrontal cortex gets in the way, and Emma’s reflex, let me just think about it, makes the case. The body has already given the answer, and the brain asks for a second opinion.
The conversation widens to couples and to midlife. Laura thinks couples therapy can host deconstruction, case by case, and notes that midlife hormonal shifts can bring dormant material back up.
If you left a high-control religion, married someone who did, or treat people who did, this conversation offers vocabulary and leaves the verdict to you. Three questions to carry in with you:
Laura’s book, her practitioner program, and her perimenopause symptom tracker are linked below. The question the episode leaves open: where did you learn what your body was for, and who has been permitted to revise the lesson since?
I think that purity culture is a form of sexual abuse.
I tend to believe sexuality is like a dimmer switch, where you slowly turn it on as you age
Bodies are not seen as sources of joy, pleasure, or safety.
Your body literally just told you what the answer is.
I don’t think there’s any winner in a patriarchal system. Nobody wins.
Where things get nerdy.
Support for the show. The show is made possible in part by Nine to Kind Planners — a planner Emma actually uses, which is a lower bar than it sounds and one most planners fail. ninetokind.com, code EMMA20 for 20% off. → https://ninetokind.com/
If this conversation reached something tender in you, send it to someone who would understand why. And if there is a question you have been almost afraid to ask, the show welcomes it: http://forms.gle/sS7z5AFH1DohJjAU6
You can find Dr. Emma on Instagram at @emmasmithphd If there’s a question you’ve been almost afraid to ask, the show wants it @theintimatephilosopherpodcast
Keywords: Religious Trauma / Desire / Embodiment / Guest Conversations

Purity Culture
older posts
older posts
newest posts
© 2025 Soliloquie
Step into the inner circle—exclusive insights and your gateway to transformation.
The VIP List
Soliloquie
No Surprises Act: You have the right to receive a Good Faith Estimate of what your services may cost.
Serving clients in TN, DC, VA, & TX
Comments will load here